Which Of The Following Is Not One Of The Additional Fees That You Can Add To Your Proposal

IT help

Electronic proposal submission

Electronic proposal submission: Go ECAS account > Become Movie number -Participant Annals (SME status?) -> Launch submission magician -> Pre-register your typhoon proposal -> List participants, contact persons -> Fill in Administrative forms -> Upload Technical Annex -> Submit your proposal (modify?) -> Receipt of submission

Proposals must be submitted online via the Electronic Submission Service of the Funding & Tenders Portal and before the call deadline.

Actions to exist completed earlier submission

Create your user account to login to the Funding & Tenders Portal
To be able to submit a proposal, you lot must first annals on the Portal for an Eu Login account.
Casher registration - Participant Identification Codes (Motion-picture show numbers)
All participants of a proposal must be registered in the central Participant Register of the Commission managing Horizon 2020. Organisations take to be identified with their Participant Identification Codes, the 9-digit PIC number in the submission forms (the coordinator has to exist identified with its PIC number at step iii, while other participants at Step 4).
Failure to do so, blocks the preparation and the submission of the proposal!

Read more about the beneficiary registration or the Film search in the Annals an organisation section.

SME registration and SME cocky-assessment: Please note that the base of operations period for calculating the SME status will be two-years backward from the cutting-off appointment (or call deadline). The submission arrangement will take into account the "effective date" (closure appointment of the accounting menstruation). If you take been registered as SME in the Participant Register before, and the latest bookkeeping period for which y'all have completed the self-assessment is older than two years, and so y'all need to fill in a new SME self-assessment.

The submission process

During the submission you will complete the 6-steps of the online submission service wizard, as explained in the IT help .

Do not forget to check the organisation requirements necessary for using the submission organisation.

It is advised to keep in listen the following features of and tips near the procedure.

Do non await until the cease to submit

Information technology is highly recommended to formally submit your proposal equally early on as possible and at least 48 hours earlier the borderline. This will avert being confronted with incompatible local IT configuration settings shortly before the borderline when insufficient fourth dimension would be left to resolve them. Please note that you can submit the proposal as many times as you want. Every submitted version will replace the previous one. Your proposal is safety and secure in our systems and will not be accessed before the deadline of the call. There is no reason to delay submission for fright of disclosure.

H2020 - Linked third parties

In step 4 of the wizard you specify the partners participating in the consortium. Any linked third party should not be inserted as a split up entity in the magician. They should only be mentioned in the narrative office of the proposal (role B) that yous will upload as a PDF file in the final pace of the wizard. No PIC for a linked third party is necessary at the proposal stage and in the administrative form of the proposal (step 5) the upkeep for a linked tertiary party should be added to the budget of the beneficiary to which they belong (no split row in the budget tabular array).

A PIC has to be provided for the linked tertiary party and the budget for the third party has to be specified separately Merely when a successful projection enters the grant preparation phase.

Access rights of private contact persons

In footstep 4 of the wizard you too specify the contact persons for the partners participating in the consortium. To read more about the level of access rights, run into the Roles & admission rights section.

Changes to organisation-related information during proposal preparation

If your organisation is already registered, but organisation-related data has inverse during proposal preparation, y'all cannot update it directly in the submission organisation; this update must be requested via the Participant Register, available on the My Organisations section of the Funding & Tenders Portal:

by the LEAR (or Account Administrators) for validated entities
by the Cocky-registrant if your organisation has non been validated past the Commission however

The organization data tin can be updated by any LEAR who was appointed during FP7 or H2020. A LEAR has to exist nominated for H2020 by the time (s)he starts appointing the Legal Signatory(ies) (LSIGNs) for signature of a grant agreement.

Folio limits and formatting requirements for the technical annex (part B)

Mandatory page limits and formatting requirements may apply to (sure) sections of the technical annex (part B) of the proposal, as indicated on the call page, in the template and in the system. If there is a folio limit on sure parts or annexes, the system volition warn applicants about any excess pages. Whatever remaining excess pages will be watermarked and experts will exist instructed to disregard them when evaluating proposals.

Checklist for official submission

Before the coordinator (or sole applicant) officially submits the proposal, check that:

your proposal fulfils the weather condition ready out in the call
the proposal (both the authoritative forms and technical addendum) is complete, readable, accessible and printable
the requested declarations have been made
all consortium members take:
- obtained access to the electronic commutation system (i.due east. to the 'My Area' department of the Funding & Tenders Portal)
- registered in the Participant Annals.

Mock evaluation

On the call/topic pages and in the Funding & Tenders Portal the evaluation forms similar to those used by our experts for the evaluation of your proposal are bachelor. It is strongly recommended that you use these forms to assess the strengths and weaknesses of your proposal before y'all submit it. Ideally, ask a disinterested colleague to carry out a mock evaluation.

Multiple versions of proposal

You can submit your proposal several times before the cut-off date or the call deadline, e.g. to brand updates or changes. To view and/or change your submitted proposal, go to the My Proposals page in the Funding & Tenders Portal. As long as the call has not been closed, the new submitted version will overwrite the previous one.

Multiple proposals

If the coordinator submits a number of similar proposals, the Committee may ask him/her to choose one or more of them to exist withdrawn.

Specific submission schemes

Two-stage submission schemes, you must submit a 'short outline proposal' for the first stage and yous will be invited to submit your 'full proposal' for the second phase, if y'all laissez passer the first-stage evaluation. The full proposal must be consistent with the short outline proposal and may non differ substantially.
Calls with multiple cut-off dates (eastward.g. SME instrument actions phase 1 and two): The call has a final closure date and several intermediate cut-off dates that trigger evaluation. There is an evaluation session after each cutting-off appointment and the terminal closure date (usually within a month). Later on each cutting-off date, the submitted proposals are grouped, reviewed and ranked together. Evaluation results are made bachelor immediately. If y'all miss an intermediate cutting-off engagement, the proposal will be evaluated in the next evaluation session.

Subsequently the call deadline

Once the borderline has passed, no further corrections or re-submissions are possible. However, a read-only admission to the submitted proposal is granted for proposal contacts in case they wish to verify what has been submitted. The proposals that have non been submitted (remaining with "DRAFT" status in the submission system) are accessible for 90 days after the telephone call deadline from the My Proposals folio.

If during the final days of the submission procedure there is a fault in the system, the Commission may decide to extend the call deadline appropriately.

Notification after submission

All contact persons of the coordinating arrangement ('coordinator'/'Host Institution') volition receive an electronic mail after each submission of the proposal. The submitted proposal packet is combined into one document and an e-receipt is generated indicating the date and fourth dimension of submission by the user. When the e-receipt is ready, it tin exist downloaded from Stride half-dozen of the submission. If you accept not received this e-mail, it is because the proposal has not been submitted. If yous miss the call borderline, your proposal will exist overlooked by the organization and we volition not consider it as submitted.

After proposal submission

There is no further contact betwixt the Commission and the applicants on the proposal until afterwards the completion of the evaluation, with the exception of the following cases:

If the Commission needs to contact you to clarify matter such as eligibility or to asking boosted information
In instance the Commission needs more information or supporting documents for ethics screening, security scrutiny, legal entity validation, financial viability check
In response to an inquiry or complaint made by you
For calls which are subject field to hearings or interviews (if applicable according to the piece of work plan/call text)

Withdrawal of submitted proposals

Proposals may be withdrawn before the telephone call borderline at Footstep half-dozen. These withdrawn proposals volition subsequently not be considered for evaluation or for option, nor count against possible re-application restrictions (e.g. in case of ERC actions).
For a proposal to be withdrawn afterwards the phone call deadline, special rules may apply (read the data package for the call); therefore withdrawal has to be requested via the IT Helpdesk.
Once the withdrawal process is finalised, the new status will be displayed on the 'My Proposals' page of the Funding & Tenders Portal.

For non-submitted proposals a 'Delete' activity push is available on the My Proposals page until the proposal has been submitted at least once.

Lodging a complaint near a failed submission

If y'all think that the submission of your proposal was not entirely successful due to a technical error on the side of the Commission, you may guild a complaint through the IT Helpdesk on the Funding & Tenders Portal. For the complaint to be admissible it must be filed inside 4 calendar days following that of the call closure. You will receive an acknowledgement of receipt the aforementioned or next working day.

What else to do? Y'all should secure a PDF version of all the parts B and annexes of your proposal property a fourth dimension postage (file attributes listing the date and fourth dimension of creation and last modification) that is prior to the call borderline dd/mm/yyyy:hh:mm, as well as any proof of the alleged failure (eastward.g. screenshots). Later on in the procedure you may be requested by the It Helpdesk to provide these items. Please annotation that any information regarding the proposal will exist treated in a strictly confidential manner.

To consider your complaint is upheld, the Information technology audit trail (application log files and admission log files of the Commission Information technology systems involved) must show that at that place was indeed a technical problem on the Commission side which prevented you from submitting (or resubmitting) the proposal using the electronic submission system.

Outcome: You will become notification about the outcome of the treatment of your complaint shorty simply at latest within the time indicated in the acknowledgment of receipt. If a decision cannot be reached in this term, y'all will receive a holding reply. If your complaint is upheld, the secured files (provided by you to the Information technology Helpdesk), for which the investigation has demonstrated that technical problems on the Commission side prevented (re)submitting, will exist used equally a reference for accepting the proposal for subsequent evaluation. In absence of such documents, the version present in the It organization will exist evaluated.